Compare
SiteSherpa vs the way you do it now.
Spreadsheets, shared drives, whiteboards and a consultant on speed dial. It got you this far. Here's what it's actually costing you.
SiteSherpa vs spreadsheets
Current the moment you look at it
- Spreadsheets
- No
- SiteSherpa
- Yes — live
Knows when a licence expires
- Spreadsheets
- Only if someone checks
- SiteSherpa
- Automatic, chased for you
Survives the person who built it leaving
- Spreadsheets
- Rarely
- SiteSherpa
- Always
Audit trail
- Spreadsheets
- Version chaos
- SiteSherpa
- Every action logged
When the old way is fine: a five-person crew on one site with one client can run on paper for a while. Growing past that is when it breaks.
SiteSherpa vs manual contractor management
Insurance verified before site
- Manual chasing
- Inbox archaeology
- SiteSherpa
- Blocked until verified
Induction status
- Manual chasing
- Phone the office
- SiteSherpa
- On your screen
Who is on site right now
- Manual chasing
- The sign-in book, maybe
- SiteSherpa
- Live roll
When the old way is fine: two regular subbies you've worked with for a decade. Past that, the inbox stops scaling.
SiteSherpa vs traditional consulting alone
Deliverable
- Consulting alone
- A binder
- SiteSherpa
- A living system
Between visits
- Consulting alone
- Nothing moves
- SiteSherpa
- AI keeps it current
Cost model
- Consulting alone
- Hours, forever
- SiteSherpa
- Platform + experts where it counts
When the old way is fine: a one-off compliance question. For a system that has to stay alive between visits, a binder can't do it.
